Comments on: Lovenox Whistleblower Lawsuit Dismissed http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/4411 Let The Truth Be Told Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:31:01 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Dan Abshear http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/4411/comment-page-1#comment-6991 Dan Abshear Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:01:39 +0000 http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/4411#comment-6991 Absence of 'material', and 'lack of specificity' are the two top reasons given by the DOJ not to intervene in a whistleblower case. The DOJ maybe intervenes in 20 percent of all false claims act cases filed. Again, collusion between the DOJ and corporations. Material relates to a subjective interpretation of how the evidence is important, relevant, or necessary to the accusations by the plantiff. specifity is even more subjective, as it is assessed for how the evidence relates to the accusations by the plantiff. The whistleblower must know, above all else with evidence to substantiate their allegations, that anything in writing is simply golden. The whistleblower must possess documents for evidence above all else. Absence of ‘material’, and ‘lack of specificity’ are the two top reasons given by the DOJ not to intervene in a whistleblower case. The DOJ maybe intervenes in 20 percent of all false claims act cases filed. Again, collusion between the DOJ and corporations.

Material relates to a subjective interpretation of how the evidence is important, relevant, or necessary to the accusations by the plantiff.

specifity is even more subjective, as it is assessed for how the evidence relates to the accusations by the plantiff.

The whistleblower must know, above all else with evidence to substantiate their allegations, that anything in writing is simply golden. The whistleblower must possess documents for evidence above all else.

]]>