Senators Question Medtronic Over Infuse Bone Graft

Medtonic’s <"">Infuse Bone Graft device is now the subject of a congressional probe.  Off-label use of Infuse Bone Graft has linked to life-threatening complications, and lawmakers want to know if Medtronic paid consulting fees to spine doctors to encourage use of the device in unapproved procedures. While doctors are permitted to use approved medical devices in any way they see fit, it is illegal for manufacturers like Medtronic to actively promote such uses.

Infuse Bone Graft contains recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP-2), a protein released naturally by the body.  It is approved to treat a spinal condition called Degenerative Disc Disease, as well as open fractures of the tibia.  It is also approved for use in two dental bone grafting procedures: sinus augmentation and localized alveolar ridge augmentation.  

In July, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned that the use of the Infuse Bone Graft had caused serious problems when it was used off-label in cervical spine (neck) surgeries.   Patients reported difficulty swallowing, breathing and speaking. Several required emergency treatment, including tracheotomies and the insertion of feeding tubes, as well as second surgeries.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that at least three-quarters of the roughly 200 “adverse events” reported to the FDA involve off-label uses of Infuse Bone Craft.  The Journal said that most of these complications cases involve unwanted bone growths near nerves or in areas outside targeted fusion sites. That can lead to pain, repeat surgeries and, in some cases, emergency intervention.

Now, Senators Herb Kohl (D-WI), chairman of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, have each written letters to Medtronic, asking for records relating to consulting contracts it has with physicians for Infuse Bone Graft.  Grassley also asked Medtronic to provide information about adverse events related to off-label use of Infuse.

Other orthopedic device makers have made public the names of doctors with whom they have consulting agreements, and have disclosed the amount of money the doctors are paid.  Both Grassley and Kohl want to know why Medtronic has not.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal also reported that doctors paid consulting fees by Medtronic have promoted off-label use of Infuse by, among other things, authoring articles that present unapproved uses in a favorable light.

This entry was posted in Defective Medical Devices, Legal News. Bookmark the permalink.

© 2005-2016 Parker Waichman LLP ®. All Rights Reserved.